Category Archives: For the critters

Cruelty-free Cuteness

A lot of people believe that you have to sacrifice fashion when you adopt a vegan lifestyle, but that is simply untrue. There are plenty of high-quality, cruelty-free alternatives to leather and fur out there that don’t look like crap. In fact, some of them are rather charming. I like Forever21 because they make super cute vegan clothes with synthetic materials that won’t cost you (or a fur-bearing animal) an arm and a leg. (Not only is fur and leather inhumane, it’s expensive!)

Like this cropped faux leather jacket ($48.50):

A no-leather jacket by Forever 21

A no-leather jacket by Forever 21

And these très adorable biker boots ($43.80) and flirty taupe-colored open-toed booties ($29.80):

Biker-inspired textured faux leather boots

Biker-inspired textured faux leather boots

Sassy cut-out booties by Forever 21

Sassy cut-out booties by Forever 21

Even the belts and handbags at Forever 21 are made from faux leather or other vegan materials!

Faux fur vest from Express

Faux fur vest from Express

If you’re feeling like splurging a little, you might want to check out some of Express Clothing’s faux fur and leather jackets, shrugs and vests, like this pretty mock-fur vest made from synthetic materials that will leave you $70 poorer (after using the $30-off coupon) but looking exponentially chicer (it also comes in chocolate brown).

I’m always a little wary of faux fur, because the labels don’t really have to be accurate (check out my post on dog and cat fur), but if you have no qualms about wearing something that claims to be cruelty-free, all the power to ya. It’s probably legitimately faux, but you might want to do some research on the product before you buy it just to be sure.

Olsen Haus is a “pure vegan” company that makes some pretty irresistible shoes, but they’re a little more pricey than the vegan shoes at Forever 21, so this is another vegan company that falls into the splurge category. Even though I can’t afford most of the shoes at Olsen Haus, they’re one of my favorite vegan companies because they have material about the gruesome truth behind leather, suede and wool on their site. It’s important that people know where their purchases come from, which is why I urge you to check out the page here: http://www.olsenhaus.com/truth.html.

And now for some eye foot candy from Olsen Haus:

Balance in black and citron, from Olsen Haus ($205 USD)

Balance in black and citron, from Olsen Haus ($205 USD)

Faith pumps in grey from Olsen Haus ($215 USD)

Faith pumps in grey from Olsen Haus ($215 USD)

Origin Assured = Cruelty Guaranteed

Origin Assured label furs claim to be a "responsible" and "ethical" choice, but nothing could be further from the truth.

Origin Assured label furs claim to be a "responsible" and "ethical" choice, but nothing could be further from the truth.

I was flipping through the October issue of VOGUE when I came across a four-page ad for Origin Assured (OA) label furs, complete with cheesy slogans like “LABEL ME fabulous” and misleading claims from fashion designers, such as Roberto Cavalli’s “The OA label assures customers that they are making a stylish, responsible choice.”

The OA label claims these furs come from a “well-regulated industry that adheres to strict animal standards.” Funny that this campaign, if I may call it that, is the brainchild of none other than the International Fur Trade Federation (IFTF) and its industry partners. The IFTF professes OA was born of a “desire to heighten awareness about ethically sourced fur,” but I say this is a slimy, ill-intentioned ploy to trick caring but generally naive consumers into feeling good about supporting an unethical product.

The Origin Assured label claims to assure customers the fur they’ve purchased comes from a country where national or local fur production regulations are in place.  But how can we trust an organization with its sole interest in making a buck to be completely honest about the origin of the fur its promoting? The international auction houses that sell the majority of the world’s fur (and who are in collaboration with the IFTF) are responsible for sorting, invoicing and labeling furs with the OA mark. Wouldn’t it be extremely easy to simply slip the OA label on a dog fur coat from China?

Okay, so let’s give these noble furriers the benefit of the doubt for a moment, and say all of the furs marked with the OA label really have come from responsible countries concerned with animal welfare. Like here in the Great White North, for example, the leading producer of seal pelts, where newborn seals are routinely hooked in the eye and dragged across the ice squirming and squealing, then beaten senseless until they’re dead enough to be skinned. Or in Japan, where thousands of dolphins and whales are killed every year, either by being barbarically harpooned or having their throats slashed with large knives. Or perhaps in the United States, where millions of historically wild animals (mink, for example) are kept in tiny, unsanitary cages on fur farms, literally going mad in captivity and resorting to self-mutilation and even cannibalism.  Even Hong Kong Fur Factory Ltd., which lists China United Fur Industrial Ltd. as one of its subsidiary companies made its way onto the list of OA approved manufactures. Curious, says me.

An injured fox suffers in his cage

An injured fox suffers in his cage

The fur trade rakes in an estimated $15,000,000,000 annually, all stemming from the cruel slaughter of 50 million animals worldwide. What you can be assured of is that the IFTF is keen on keeping profits up and will tell consumers whatever they need to hear in order to ensure that happens. Don’t believe everything you read. There is nothing “ethical”, “humane”, or “responsible” about the fur trade. Spin doctors will weave a wild web of lies and only need you to perpetuate their agenda.

Learn the facts at PETA’s media center. To see a full list of designers who use fur in their lines (and avoid their clothing at all costs), visit http://www.fur-style.com/en/designers/?pagination=5&cHash=f076441d4b.

FurIsDead.com

Canada Refuses to Ban Dog and Cat Fur Imports

If you buy a piece of fur clothing in Canada, chances are you’re actually sporting dog or cat hide. For those of you who think it’s perfectly okay to drape mink or fox over your shoulders, perhaps the fact that you could be wearing someone’s beloved pet and not some wild beast will put you off of pelt.

German Shepherd is all the rage in Beijing

German Shepherd is all the rage in Beijing. And how 'bout a kitty accessory?

Last month The Canadian Press reported that Ottawa would not support a ban on dog and cat fur imports, simply because doing so might undermine Canada’s position on the banning of seal products to other countries.  After the EU voted overwhelmingly to ban Canadian seal imports this summer, our Conservative government threatened to appeal the ban at the World Trade Organization. Now Canadian officials believe their case could be compromised if they don’t stand in solidarity for the barbaric slaughter of helpless animals, regardless of species. Hey, we bludgeon newborn seals like there’s no tomorrow, so who are we to say you shouldn’t slaughter puppies and kitties by the truckload? Hell, we’ll even sell your dog coats and cat scarves in our stores, since we don’t have any laws here that require us to label our furs accurately. Hound is the new fox.

But where are these furs coming from? China, Thailand and the Philippines, mainly. In these countries, animal rights (not to mention human rights) laws are extremely lax, and apparently it is cheaper and easier to abduct and slaughter dogs and cats to make fur garments than it is to produce synthetic fur. Undercover footage from the Humane Society of the United States and PETA has revealed the gruesome practices at dog and cat fur factories in these Asian countries, where millions of animals — some strays, others clearly pets — are savagely beaten, strangled, bled to death and bludgeoned, all in the name of fashion. These poor animals are scooped off the streets and stuffed into tiny cages with dozens of other dogs and cats on their way to slaughter. If they make it through the transport, they can look forward to being starved, drowned, hanged with a wire noose, and likely skinned alive. Many of them still have collars on. If you think you have the stomach to see this footage for yourself, go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alRW1sz_jeg.

On the Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade’s website, it states approximately two million dogs and cats are killed for the fur trade every year, and further reports it takes about 24 cats or 10 to 12 dogs to make one fur coat, more if they’re using puppies or kitties. These fur factories often dye and mislabel dog and cat furs to pass them off as the pelts of other species.

The existence of dog and cat fur factories is utterly appalling, but so is the existence of the fur trade itself. It should not be acceptable to kill any animal for its fur, wild or not. Every year, 40 million animals are brutally murdered for the fur on their backs. They are either caught in barbaric leg-hold traps, suffering unimaginable pain and tormented by panic until the trapper finally arrives to put them out of their misery, or worse yet, raised on factory farms, where they go mad anxiously awaiting their demise, often mutilating themselves or others in a futile attempt to escape the torture.

What can you do? Refuse to support the fur trade. The only surefire way to ensure you aren’t purchasing dog or cat fur is to avoid anything resembling fur entirely. Even fur that appears fake could be real. To find out more about dog and cat fur factories (as well as other fur trade-related facts), visit http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=56. For more information on what you can do to help stop the sale of fur, go to http://www.furisdead.com/getActive.asp and The Fur-Bearer Defenders website.

COMPASSION IS IN FASHION; FUR IS DEAD.

Dog fur

Harper Eats Seal Meat, Endorses Canadian Sealing Industry

Prime Minister Stephen Harper dines on seal meat on August 18, 2009, to show his support for the Canadian sealing industry

Prime Minister Stephen Harper dines on seal meat on August 18, 2009, to show his support for the Canadian sealing industry

The Canadian Prime Minister’s office recently released a photo to the media showing Mr. Harper – along with Human Resources Minister Diane Finley, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq and Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl – munching on seal meat during a recent visit to Iqaluit, Nunavut.

The Globe and Mail reported spokesperson Andrew MacDougall sent an email to the press announcing: “The Prime Minister said, ‘I really enjoyed eating seal meat and look forward to having it again.’”

In a shocking and symbolic political statement earlier this year, Governor General Michaëlle Jean publicly carved a freshly slaughtered seal in audacious opposition to the E.U. ban, then turned to the woman beside her and asked, “Can I try the heart?” Defence Minister Peter MacKay christened her “Canada’s new Braveheart” for this brazen act of defiance, and added, “I would encourage all Canadians to try seal. It’s a wonderful product.”

Harper argues that the sealing industry adheres to the “tightest standards” of any industry involved in the sale of animal products. If these standards assert that sealers must bludgeon the skulls of baby seals and drag their squirming bodies across the ice before skinning them (often while still alive), then I suppose he’s right.

According to PETA, “…sealers routinely hook live seals in the eye, cheek, or mouth to avoid damaging the fur, then they drag the seals across the ice. Many of these gentle creatures may not even have eaten their first solid meal or taken their first swim before they are slaughtered for their skin.”  99 percent of all seals killed for the hunt are between three weeks and three months old.

In a 2001 study commissioned by the International Fund for Animal Welfare, it was reported that many Canadian sealers were not using the hakapik properly, which contributed to “considerable and unacceptable suffering”, and added that in 17 percent of cases observed there were no visible lesions in the seals’ skulls, which means approximately 55,000 seals may have been skinned alive.

In a recent news conference, Prime Minister Harper addressed the European Union’s ban on the import of Canadian seal products that was finalized this July: “There is no reason the seal industry should be singled out for discriminatory treatment by Europeans or any other nation.” The Canadian government has already launched an appeal of the E.U. ban to the World Trade Organization.

Mr. Harper has always been an outspoken supporter of the Canadian seal hunt, claiming this industry is essential to the survival of communities in Northern and Atlantic Canada. However, the E.U. ban would not affect the Inuit populations in Canada, as it would still allow the trade of seal products derived from hunts carried out by indigenous communities that contribute to their sustenance.

The total allowable catch (TAC) of seals in Canada for 2009 is 280,000 harp seals, 8,200 hooded seals, and 50,000 grey seals, which amounts to 338,200. There are also a number of seals that are “struck and lost”, which the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association reports is approximately 16,250 annually.

It would appear that the sealing industry is a Canadian gold mine, judging by all the fuss from the government to stop the E.U ban on seal product imports from Canada. There is virtually no market for seal meat, so these fluffy babies are being killed for the coats on their backs. The startling truth is that the life of a Canadian seal is reduced to a mere $14, the current value of a single pelt.

The Canadian seal hunt is a barbaric practice that causes unimaginable suffering to thousands of baby seals every year. Despite public outrage and pressure on the government to stop the hunt, the massacre continues. Please speak out against this cruelty and urge the Canadian government to stop the seal hunt.

A young seal witnesses the bloody remains of his murdered mates

A young seal witnesses the bloody remains of his murdered mates

For more information on the Canadian seal hunt and to find out what you can do to stop it, visit:
http://www.canadiansealhunt.com/ , http://www.harpseals.org/about_the_hunt/pelts.html

Stop the Seal Slaughter

Culpable Cruelty at Covance

Bip woke to the sound of screeching, just as she had almost every day of her young life. Boo and Bim were not in her cage, and she feared the crying and screaming was coming from her brothers. She glanced to the corner of her room where her mother’s cage was kept and was relieved to see that The Coats had not taken Mae as well; at least she wouldn’t lose every last member of her family this morning. The screeching eventually stopped, likely because the terrified monkeys had given in to exhaustion and accepted defeat.

Soon after, two of The Coats returned to Bip’s room with Boo and Bim hanging limply in their arms. Boo was unconscious, and though Bim was still awake, he was completely listless and unresponsive to the sights and sounds around him. Both monkeys were covered in blood, and The Coats joked about looking like axe murderers with all the blood splattered on their once stark white lab jackets. They forcefully threw Bim and Boo back into their cage and left the room, still laughing about the blood on their coats. Bip tried to shake words out of Bim, but her frightened brother simply sat hunched in the corner, staring blankly at the hallway across the room. She was finally able to wake Boo and convinced him to tell her what had happened.

“They held us down while one of The Coats approached with a big tube. They got to Bim first, and shoved the tube down his throat, pouring a horrible greasy substance into his stomach. I could tell it was terribly painful; Bim squirmed and cried and blood kept coming up through the tube. When they were finished with him they walked over to me with the same tube, laughing about how much blood could come out of such a small monkey.  I tried to fight them off and get away, but they hit me in the face with a pipe over and over…and I guess I passed out.”

Tube dosing

Bip had not been taken to the grease pit before, but she usually met with the same fate as her brothers, so she feared that was where she’d be headed the next time The Coats came for her.

A week earlier, her leg had been broken by one of The Coats as she struggled while a tube was inserted into her nose.  She was left in her cage for days without any kind of painkiller while the inexperienced vet toyed over what to do about the break. He finally decided to amputate Bip’s leg, as it seemed to him “the easiest way”.

Bip and her brothers were born in Covance, a drug testing laboratory in Virginia. She’d accepted the daily abuse at Covance as a normal part of life, simply because it was all she had ever known. But her mother Mae had been plucked from the Jungle a year earlier and struggled more with life at Covance than those who had been bred and born there.

Bip was used to suffering and had witnessed many horrific procedures during her time at Covance, but nothing could have prepared her for the nightmare that was about to unfold.

Later that afternoon, The Coats came back to collect Bip and her mother. They held them by their arms and legs and carried Bip and Mae into a massive room with dozens of small, clear tubes on one side and a monkey morgue on the other. Bip couldn’t take her eyes off what looked like hundreds of dead monkeys separated into two categories: unexpected deaths, marked with red tags, and planned deaths, marked with yellow tags. What frightened her most was that the majority of the monkeys in the morgue had red tags dangling from their feet. She recognized some of the bodies as her friends, but was shocked by just how many monkeys had spent their lives and died in this facility.

Test tubes

Before Bip could linger on that thought for too long, she was shoved head first into one of the tubes, then watched as her mother, writhing and sobbing, was put into a tube beside her. Mae told Bip that she loved her and asked her to be brave, though it was difficult for Bip to see passed the utter terror in her mother’s eyes; she was sure this would be the end of them both.

A needle was inserted into one leg of each monkey that had been placed into these tubes and a substance was infused into the monkeys’ veins for 10 minutes. Bip was relieved when the infusion finally stopped, but the real suffering began only five short minutes later when she and the other monkeys were bled for testing purposes, a procedure that took place eight more times over the 12-hour period that followed. Bip felt herself losing control of her body, and within hours of her first dosing, she was completely unable to move. She overheard a few of The Coats discussing what this torture was for, and all she could make out was that they were testing a new pharmaceutical product.

On the tenth day of the tests, the monkey to Bip’s right was hunched over in a small cage, and she wondered if there was any life left in him; her mother was in a tube to her left, and she watched in despair as Mae began to convulse violently. One of The Coats approached her mother’s tube and simply noted Mae’s condition on a clipboard. They did nothing to help Mae, and her shaking body eventually came to rest. Bip’s mother was dead. Her lifeless body was dumped out of the tube into a pile of monkeys that had succumbed to the cruel tests at Covance.

The tests continued for two weeks, during which period all of the monkeys involved in this procedure had suffered tremendously.  Many had swollen or “dead” legs, most suffered convulsions and several had vomited all over themselves while stuck in the tiny tubes. All experienced severe anxiety and indescribable fear.

Two days after Christmas, the torture finally ended. The Coats injected one last dose of a different substance into Bip and the rest of the monkeys that had survived this trial, once and for all ending the suffering they had inflicted on their helpless test subjects. All of the monkeys were moved to the other side of the room and labelled with red tags.

Sick and injured

The above story is a dramatization of actual atrocities that were committed at Covance. Thousands of monkeys continue to suffer abuse, neglect and psychological torment in drug testing facilities, and millions of animals experience the same torturous existence in research facilities across the world.

Bioculture (a company that sells primates to various testing labs) is proposing the construction of a breeding facility in Puerto Rico. Please do your part to stop this from happening, and go to https://secure.peta.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2259 to send a letter to Puerto Rican Governor Luis Fortuño asking him to stop the construction of this primate breeding facility.

Also visit http://www.stopanimaltests.com/primates-inlaboratories.asp to learn more about animal testing and to find out what you can do to help put a stop to this abuse.

Caring Consumer

Since when is swaddling yourself in animal carcass sexy?

On a recent trip to my local animal shelter (I was looking into becoming a foster parent) I picked up a newsletter belonging to the Fur-Bearer Defenders. I’ve always opposed trapping and have thought the sale of real fur products should be illegal, but I was appalled to learn more about the actual practices and real legalities of the fur trade.

 

 

Let Trapping Die

Animals trapped for the fur trade are generally caught in one of three types of traps: the leg-hold trap, the conibear trap and the snare trap. These contraptions are slightly different in design, but all serve as a cruel and inhumane means to an unjust end for millions of animals every year. 

Supporters of the fur trade would have you believe there are modified leg-hold traps that are more humane than the traditional steel traps, though the modifications are ineffective in their (supposed) aim and just as cruel as traditional traps. The so-called “padded trap” has a small piece of material attached to the steel jaws of the leg-hold trap that does not afford any greater comfort to the trapped and panicking animal as it dies. The “offset trap” has a 3/16″ gap between the closed jaws of the steel leg-hold trap. The “laminated trap” has extra steel added to its jaws to make it slightly wider than the traditional leg-hold trap. None of these traps are any more humane than their traditional cousins; modified traps are simply propaganda tools to maintain a sad facade.

The conibear trap was initially touted as an instant-kill trap, though they’ve disproved themselves, as even trappers often refer to these traps as “body-grippers”. There are simply too many variables, such as speed, angle of entry and size of animal, that need to fall into place perfectly for the conibear trap to work as intended. The truth is that these traps normally clamp down on the unsuspecting victim (often in incredibly uncomfortable places, such as the neck, belly or shoulder) causing a drawn-out, agonizing death.

The snare may be the most inhumane trap, though this is very difficult to quantify, as all traps are basically torture devices. It consists of a wire loop that tightens around the trapped animal as it struggles, slowly strangling the animal to its last breath.

A Wolverine mangled in a Snare

Though there couldn’t possibly be any humane or right way to kill an animal simply for the coat on their back, perhaps some of the suffering could be eased by allowing these furry victims a quick and relatively painless death. But this is not the case: almost all trapped animals die very slow, desperate, painful deaths. In Canada, traps are usually checked between one and five days, which means an unlucky animal caught in a trap is often kept in a state of excruciating pain and desperate panic until the trapper arrives to end its life…if it’s lucky…

In a frenzied attempt to escape, trapped animals often mutilate themselves, break teeth and bones, dislocate joints, and even chew off their own limbs. If an animal has successfully freed themselves from the jaws of the trap by chewing off the clamped limb, they will almost certainly die in the wild sometime thereafter, either by infection, by starvation as a result of their inability to hunt, or by becoming easy prey. 

 

A Waste of Life – Accidental Catches

Our own furry family members (as in Rex or Snowflake, not Uncle Jack) are frequently caught in traps left for larger game. In Canada, they are considered unwanted catches and are thrown away if found dead by the trapper, or released badly injured, if they’ve managed to survive. Accidental catches often include porcupines, squirrels, rabbits, owls, ducks and other small animals. Sometimes even endangered species find themselves in the cold jaws of these traps.

 

Canada Bullies EU Into Continuing to Import Fur

The European Union (EU) passed a resolution through parliament to ban the use of leg-hold traps in its member countries, as well as the import of furs from countries still using leg-hold traps. Canada’s response: “Oh no you di-n’t!” As the fur trade continues to be one of Canada’s leading sources of income, officials would not stand by and let legislation pass that would see an enormous decline in its fur exports. Canada resultantly threatened the EU with severe economic penalties and battles under the terms of The World Trade Organization and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Canada manipulated the EU into an International Agreement, which they proclaimed would ensure better welfare for trapped animals and the eventual ban of leg-hold trapping, and convinced the EU to exempt them from the fur ban.

In reality, the new standards set within the International Agreement are basically bureaucratic bullshit that do nothing to improve the welfare of trapped animals. The agreement stated that “padded” and “offset” leg-hold traps (as explained above) would still be used, and further outlined that traditional steel leg-hold traps would continue to be used in or near the water. 

The United States, another big player in the fur trade game, was also able to deceive the EU into excluding them from the fur ban in many of the same ways that Canada did within the International Agreement; however, an even bigger problem exists within fur trapping laws in the USA: authority over trapping lies completely within each individual state in the US, which means each state gets to decide whether or not they will comply with the terms of the agreement. 

 

A Call for Stricter Laws 

Imagine for me, if you will, that you are taking a leisurely walk through your neighborhood when you stumble into a steel trap with a lovely, if measly, piece of fabric lining its jaws. Your ankle is broken instantly by the force of the jaws clamping down on it, and you notice blood start to form a pool around your foot. You writhe and cry and scream in pain, try to free yourself, but simply cannot pull the jaws away from your leg. You lie in agony for five days, starving, freezing and starting to become delirious with exhaustion, until finally a figure starts to appear in the distance. As the figure approaches, you notice they are carrying an axe. “Oh thank GOD,” you think to yourself, “this guy must be coming to save me…he’ll use that axe to remove this awful device from my leg and take me somewhere nice where I can be treated for my injuries.” The man with the axe gets closer and closer, and as you begin to relay your horrific tale to him, he stares at you blankly while he swings the axe up over his head and then forcefully down into your neck, where you bleed out and die, and are soon after scalped. You’ve just been brutally trapped and killed for your lovely head of hair: some rich socialite would like a new brunette wig. 

The truth is that we don’t NEED fur for anything. It is merely a unnecessary luxury with a brutal background. Trapping of any kind for fur should be made completely illegal, as should be both the import and export of fur internationally. This is a sick and inhumane practice that kills millions of innocent lives annually for the sole purpose of financial gain, and needs to be stopped, once and for all.  Visit www.banlegholdtraps.com for more information and to find out how you can help.